case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2018-03-02 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #4076 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4076 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Dustin Henderson from "Stranger Things"]


__________________________________________________
















03. [SPOILERS for Black Panther post-credits scene]



__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for possible discussion of incest (fic)]



__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual harassment/#metoo]



__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for possible discussion of sexual harassment/#metoo]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for possible discussion of non-con/underage/etc]














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #583.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 01:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm kind of not getting the point of this secret, either. Is OP wanting some kind of 'omg, you big black stud!!' kind of cheesy porn?

And if people *did* write that, how many others in fandom would start pearl-clutching over racism and exoticizing the character? So pretty much nobody is going to do that.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
What I got from is is that BBC is common enough in mainstream porn so OP's wants to know why it's essentially absent in fandom.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:23 am (UTC)(link)
And let's be honest: the fact that BBC is that common in mainstream porn is (partly) a result of racism.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
And fandom isn't?

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
fandom isn't what?

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
racist

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
oh! no, fandom is racist. i wasn't offering that as an explanation for why fandom doesn't have BBC. i was just saying - if BBC became popular in fandom, it wouldn't entirely be pearl-clutching for people to point out the racist dynamics.

i mean, it's a kind of complicated relationship between race and porn, and the idea would inevitably be addressed with all the subtlety and attention to nuance of a flamethrower if/when people brought it up, but the underlying point isn't entirely out there.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt but I totally agree with all of this.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
Probably because people don't want to be called a racist and dogpiled.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
Yet people will write fics containing abuse, fetishized sexism etc despite writers/consumers of such fics increasingly being dogpiled and called increasingly horrible things.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
Because some of the abuse is written as a way to deal with trauma, and no one is out in the real world fetishizing abuse victims. Actual black men, for instance, still have to face the BBC thing in the real world.

So - a little different.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 02:17 am (UTC)(link)
So you think the difference is that people can more easily shrug off being dogpiled for fetishizing abuse/sexism/whatever because they know they aren't actually sexist abuse fetishists, whereas people would feel bad about being called a racist for writing race fetish fic because they know their fetish makes them racist?

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 02:27 am (UTC)(link)
If that's not what you meant, how was I meant to interpret your statement that race fetishes affect real people and abuse fetishes don't?
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
And where did i say that?
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 02:32 am (UTC)(link)
And, actually? Please go argue with someone else, I'm just not interested enough to continue.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not arguing, I just have no idea what this comment was supposed to mean:

"no one is out in the real world fetishizing abuse victims. Actual black men, for instance, still have to face the BBC thing in the real world.

So - a little different."

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 07:24 am (UTC)(link)
"no one is out in the real world fetishizing abuse victims"
I work in social services and...NO. They really, really are.

(Anonymous) 2018-03-03 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
This, and I say it as a fanwriter.

I can get away with exoticising one half of a couple if and only if that half is tied to a fantasy construct (vampires, werewolves, etc). The moment I try doing it with an actual human for the sake of kink, here come the death threats! Because I'm a terrible, horrible white (as far as anyone can tell just by my skin color) person. Even though that's the only square on the non-minority bingo card I hit.

So the actual race kink stays in a drawer until/unless I sanitize it into what doesn't draw the ire of a million screaming fools.
tabaqui: (Default)

[personal profile] tabaqui 2018-03-03 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty much this. I'm kind of baffled at OP's confusion.
maximumhusky: blue sakura branches front of lantern (Default)

[personal profile] maximumhusky 2018-03-03 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
The main difference is like the difference between RPF and regular fanfic: portrayals of real people. People don't mind whatever ruleset you ascribe to a werewolf or vampire, because hey it's fiction and might be relevant to the story. But saying that people IRL behave according to some made up ruleset like fictional beings is just demeaning.