[ SECRET POST #4083 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4083 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #584.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

IMO sexualizing kids would generally be a bad thing regardless of what was in the original source material.

I have no idea whether that's happening in the fandom - I'm not familiar with the fandom, and if it only involves aging characters up, that's a different thing. But what I am saying is that I don't think OP's logic holds universally true, you know? There are still things that would be objectionable regardless of how mature or R-rated South Park is (and also, no matter how annoyed you are at Tumblr).

[(Anonymous)]

oh nah, the crazies in SP fandom are definitely mad at even the aging up. Because they are KIDS in canon, so to even age them up means you were thinking about children sexually to begin with, which makes you a PEDO!!!

The morality police in SP fandom are ferocious and fucking *crazy*.

[(Anonymous)]

My brain does not wish to comprehend the notion that there are people morality policing South Park. I mean... It's fucking South Park. Have they even seen the show?

[(Anonymous)]

I had the same question too. I mean... I'm pretty sure there is an episode titled Cartman gets an anal probe and another one where hee tries to put his dick into Butters' mouth?!

[(Anonymous)]

The very first episode is called "Cartman Gets an Anal Probe," yeah. And he successfully put his dick in Butters' mouth which lead to him jumping through a bunch of hoops to keep the photo from getting out and people thinking he's gay.

Whoever's trying to moral police the SP fandom / show as a whole... Man I just wanna pour one out for you because good fucking luck, my dudes.

[killertofuuu]

I've been in the SP fandom since about 2014 and I can't wrap my head around that either.

[(Anonymous)]

By this logic, wouldn't sexualizing adult human beings also count as pedophilia since we were all children at some point? Would wanting to fuck your best friend that you grew up with (when you're both adults) count as pedophilia since you knew them as a kid?

[(Anonymous)]

According to Tumblr, all sex involving a person who was ever a child is pedophilia. And all sex is also rape by deception because you can never truly know another person.

[(Anonymous)]

But... it's South Park. Anything that could be found objectionable about it has already happened in canon. If you're against mature content involving kids, complain to Troy Parker and Matt Stone before you start on the fandom.

[(Anonymous)]

Kids wind up in sexual situations all the time in South Park. Have the morality police forgotten about the episode where Ike has an affair with his kindergarten teacher, or the episode where Butters becomes a pimp, or the episode where Jimmy sleeps with a prostitute to get rid of his erection on time for the talent show, or the episode where Cartman drugs Butters to take pictures of him in compromising poses, or the episode where Kyle becomes part of a human centipede, or the episode where Paris Hilton sells lingerie to nine-year-olds, or any of the episodes involving the Raisins girls? It's pretty silly to attack fanwriters for writing stories that aren't even a tenth as inappropriate as an average episode of that show.

[(Anonymous)]

Having characters in sexual situations still isn't quite the same as sexualizing them, in the sense of portraying them as objects of sexual desire.