[ SECRET POST #4131 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4131 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[Cardcaptor Sakura, Pokémon Black/White, Sonic the Hedgehog, Lord of the Rings]



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.
["Babushka Lady", JFK assassination]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Jessica Jones season 2]


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ready Player One]


__________________________________________________



08.
[The Great British Bake Off]








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #591.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I haven't watched season 2 yet, but part of the reason it took me three attempts to get through season 1 was because, while I really wanted to like the show, I can't stand this type of thing. And for people saying "that's what her character/the genre IS, though?!" there is this little thing called character development and narrative that suggests - even REQUIRES - shows to change from their initial set-up over time.

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. It's really weird to me the responses in this thread that don't seem to understand how that works. Jessica already experiences change and development in season 1. She continues to experience it in season 2, when she gets involved with Oscar and his kid. Like that's not a big, uncharacteristic change for her?

[(Anonymous)]

DA

So your issue isn't that she doesn't change... it's that she reverts to her old ways?

I mean, I just don't understand these lofty expectations from a Netflix comic book noir. It looks like the same old sex negativity to me, pretentiously packaged as concerns about good writing.

[(Anonymous)]

DA - there's a difference between sex negativity and calling out unhealthy sexual behavior, you know. Being sex positive doesn't mean thinking all sex is positive.

AND it's bad writing to ignore character development and go back to the same well over and over again. It's almost like these are two different arguments.