(no subject)

[case]

Sorry to poll you guys so soon after the other one, but the idea came up: tagging posts with the fandoms of the posted secrets.

Pros:
+ Much easier to go back and find specific secrets
+ Much easier to go back and find specific fandoms
+ If you're late(r) to the post, easier to check for your fandoms without loading the post for the Name the Fandom thread

Cons:
- Giant block of tags at the bottom of each post (90 secrets with 90 fandoms = 90 tags in one post -- yeah)
- Waaay labor intensive; 584 posts to go back and tag (though you guys can help with this)

[Poll #1239073]

ETA:

Ok! If we do put in tags, they'll go up on the posts after they've moved off the front page. So no GIANT LIST OF TAGS appearing on your flist, but they'll be there for anyone who wants to search the archives.

Comments

[glitterfairy25.livejournal.com]

I LOVE TAGS BUT NOW I'VE LOST THE GAME, AND I'M UNHAPPY.

tagging

[shusu.livejournal.com]

As admins there is an option for you to control *what* tags are on there, and members can tag their own. Those of us who want to be able to find all our sekrits omg plz can go back and do the legwork ourselves.

Therefore, no work for you other than adding fandom names, and no troll-tags.

[sdissynthium.livejournal.com]

I voted yes, even though there would be a million tags to search through.

[tea-and-opium.livejournal.com]

it's a great idea, even though it'll take a bazillion years to tag all of the past entries. ;__________;

also: no Harvey Dent option? *shot*

[daluci.livejournal.com]

What about the fact that a lot of the images end up broken after a while..? Are we operating under the assumption that it should be noted as that for all of ever, just in case? /late to the party

[kinosino.livejournal.com]

No! Then we couldn't show off our obscure-fandom-recognizing geekdom skills!

This icon? What is it?! YOU DON'T KNOW. NO ONE KNOWS. AH-HAHAHAHAHAHAHA.