[ SECRET POST #4329 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4329 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 44 secrets from Secret Submission Post #620.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Technically, the movie characters were based on the Marvel comics characters, which are very loosely based on the Norse pantheon. If you're waiting for any of the MCU stuff to align more with the Prose Edda, that's not going to happen because that's not the canon sandbox they're playing in. And while I'm sure that none of this is news to you, your fandom experience will probably be a lot less aggravating if you stop expecting the property based on 70-year-old comic book characters to be accurate to the 800+ year-old mythology that it stole names from.

[sparklywalls]

+1

There's also loads of fanfic that does try to blend elements of the myths into MCU canon so let's not pretend that Marvel fans are completely/deliberately ignorant of the Norse origins. Some of them have even got *into* Norse mythology through Marvel. And heck even the comics flirt with many elements of the Eddas. But it's never going to be exactly the same as they're not meant to be the exact same characters and I'm fine with it. Loki is Thor's brother in Marvel continuity rather than Odin's blood brother? Doesn't bother me.

(What we have might not even be the original orignals anyway due to the relative lack of written record. I could go on for hours over how much Loki has been getting bad press for c1000 years and might not have been the pure evil figure he's often designated as in other media but that's a whole other rant. He's also not the only mythological figure to be crammed through the lens of modern audience expectations so I try not to stress about it.)

[(Anonymous)]

I'm actually glad to hear that some people have gotten into the mythology because of the comics/movies.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean... yeah...
I guess I should have specified that my annoyance came from, well, exactly what you said;; The fact that the original comic series essentially stole their identities without any intention of properly representing them in the first place... I'm not expecting that to change any time soon either;; I'm just disappointed that it happened in the first place;;

Rather, I meant that even with my reluctance to participate in the franchise- (my argument happened to be face to face, not within the fandom)- that the idea that Loki's actor will reprise his role in the spinoff might mean that the creators put enough care/effort in making it, that Tom wanted to continue the roll. But more likely than not, he was fixed in by some contract that gave him little choice in the matter, and the creators are banking on having a famous actor, rather then any formidable story line...;;