Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-05-03 11:10 pm
[ SECRET POST #4501 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4501 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Avengers: Endgame]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Homestuck Epilogues]
[WARNING for incest, noncon/dubcon]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #644.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 02:17 am (UTC)(link)>Why? It was foreshadowed that he had a tough time getting used to the future and couldn't get a life. Although the timeline made no goddamn sense, but none of the time travel did.
The winter soldier was all about him letting go of the past and moving on. Just like Peggy tells him to do.
Bringing back a different Gamora was offensive.
>offensive
Yeah, if they replace old Gamora with the new one as a love interest, that is pretty awful.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 03:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 03:15 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 03:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 04:10 am (UTC)(link)This is such a weird take. She's not a different person, she's herself with the clock rolled back a few years. True, she will never be exactly the same as the Gamora we knew first, because there'll be about 4 years of experiences that Gamora 1.0 had that Gamora 2.0 won't ever have. But unless you think that the first 25(?) or so years of her life wasn't sufficient to establish her identity, she is Gamora.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 04:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 04:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)Fundamentally: adjective. serving as, or being an essential part of, a foundation or basis; basic; underlying
No, fundamentally, she is the exact same person - child taken by Thanos who she secretly hates, raised in constant competition with her adopted sister, holds serious doubts about Thanos' "grand" plan. Her experiences with the Guardians did not make her who she is, they simply honed what was already there.
Really boiled down, it's just a classic amnesia trope. It could be handled poorly, or it could be handled well. I choose to be optimistic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 04:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 06:04 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 07:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-04 09:17 am (UTC)(link)Hahaha, but that's comic books for you. Seriously, I won't get into the merits of fictional reset buttons right now but you have to know your material.
Honestly, keeping Gamora 2.0 around and dealing with the ensuing fallouts would be the bolder choice. So they're not gonna do that. Here's how they're actually going to go about it: in the next Guardians film, a cosmic something something will imbue Gamora 2.0 with all the memories of her OG self, up to and including dying at Thanos's hand. This should be a traumatizing event, but in universe it'll play out as nbfd. We're back at pre-IW status lineup-wise, and Marvel gets their cake and eats it too.