Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2019-05-17 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #4515 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4515 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Underworld movies]
__________________________________________________
04. https://i.imgur.com/wIPV77K.png
[OP warned for blood/gore/etc]
05. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
08. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

__________________________________________________
09. [SPOILERS for Avengers: Endgame]

__________________________________________________
10. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]
[WARNING for discussion of rape]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #646.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 12:05 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 01:00 am (UTC)(link)also
https://thenib.com/mister-gotcha
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 01:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 02:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 02:57 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 03:28 am (UTC)(link)I mean, I actually have no idea who that is, so I'm kind of genuinely asking (and it's also entirely possible he's a wanker for other unrelated reasons).
But based on what you've presented here - one, it seems like you're conflating a lot of possible criticisms here, whether it's of corporate control of art, or capitalism more broadly. For instance, it's possible to have criticisms of corporate art outside of the simple fact that it involves the exchange of art for money, so it's not even necessarily the case that putting your art up for sale is even a little bit of a contradiction.
Two, the reality is that even people who are deeply critical of capitalism have to exist. And the reality is that we exist in a society where capitalism is the predominant social and economic system. To a very real extent, existing in society means engaging with capitalism on some level. So, basically, just pointing that reality out is really not an effective refutation of the criticisms people make of capitalism.
And, I mean, I think there probably are reasonable conversations to have about how you weigh those things against each other and what that practically entails, and a lot of disagreement. But just asserting that asking for money while being critical of capitalism makes you a wanker is a bad argument.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 03:43 am (UTC)(link)I am generally critical of capitalism. I am generally in favour of artists who criticise capitalism. I am 100% in favour, at all times, of artists being able to eat and keep a roof over their heads.
But when an artist goes out of their way to assert that every OTHER artist who's looking to get a steady paycheque is a cheap corporate shill and a tool of the man - then I'm gonna call them a wanker. What else would you call them?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-18 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2019-05-19 05:38 am (UTC)(link)Oh, and that doesn't make him not being a douche, but let's not give his fans tools to make it as if no criticism of him is valid.