[ SECRET POST #4522 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4522 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Matrix]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mr Meaty]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Roxanne from A Goofy Movie]


__________________________________________________


























05. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



06. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]

[Arya/Gendry]


__________________________________________________



07. [SPOILERS for Game of Thrones]



__________________________________________________



08. [SPOILERS for Avengers Endgame]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Avengers Endgame]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Dawson's Creek]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for abuse, etc.]

[ProJared]



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #647.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Why would you feel guilty about this? Is it any different from supprting any other creator?

[(Anonymous)]

This is not my personal opinion, but lots of people feel that sites like Patreon are leading "the commercialization of fandom"

[(Anonymous)]

Not everyone using Patreon and the like are selling fanworks, though. There are a lot of original content creators out there, too, and I don't think all fandom-related works really count as commercialized fandom. A movie-reviewer with a Patreon is more like a movie-reviewer who gets paid by a newspaper than a fanzine contributor.

[(Anonymous)]

Depends. If it is money just to pay for supplies and such I don't have a problem. But I actually think it is wrong and also a clear copyright violation to profit from someone else's intellectual property. Fanworks for free isn't a problem. Getting money for supplies is fine. But actual profit is not.

[(Anonymous)]

Copyright is a legal standard and not a moral one. It's not prima facie morally wrong to commercialize fanworks simply on the grounds that it's a copyright violation. And talking about intellectual property, from a strictly moral point of view, clearly requires a bunch of discussions about who actually holds and benefits from intellectual property ownership.

[(Anonymous)]

A lot of people here are extremely against the idea of fans getting money for fanwork