[ SECRET POST #4593 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4593 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 42 secrets from Secret Submission Post #658.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I get what you mean, but there has to be an ounce of realism in a design for it to be defended from 'body-shamers'. Like how when Free! came out there was backlash from guys who were put out that their bodies couldn't realistically look like that irl, and were bitter. It's not the same, but both character designs were made in the way of eye candy.
Body shaming begun with characters, and models, and whatnot, with 'perfect' bodies that people just can get without plastic surgery/being born that way + rigorous exercise. So there's nothing inherently wrong with having that body type, but it seems it's come full circle where people used to say it was alright not to look like that, to, you can't portray someone looking like that because it's 'toxic'.
The picture choice isn't helping your point though.