case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2019-11-28 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #4710 ]


⌈ Secret Post #4710 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 08 secrets from Secret Submission Post #674.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
luxshine: (Default)

[personal profile] luxshine 2019-11-30 10:06 am (UTC)(link)
One of the reasons I am not active in the Latin American StSeiya fandom despite having been involved in it when it began in Mexico is due to the very militant way they stick to fanon details as if they were canon. I can understand headcanons (I personally will never see Dohko or Shion as anything but the SaintSeiya equivalent of Miguel and Tulio, but I KNOW it's a Headcanon), but the way in which things like the Angelo name just make me go "nope"
silverr: abstract art of pink and purple swirls on a black background (Default)

[personal profile] silverr 2019-11-30 02:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh yeah, that "fanon = canon" inflexibility is infuriating (and certainly is found in fandoms of all tongues)