Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-01-10 06:48 pm
[ SECRET POST #4753 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4753 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04. [SPOILERS for Sanditon]

[Lord Babington/Esther Denham]
__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Legion]

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who, Life Is Strange]

__________________________________________________
07. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]

__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual abuse of a minor]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 07 secrets from Secret Submission Post #680.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I will admit that it squicks me to see minors in sexual situations even in fiction or to see them sexualized as in loli/shota. And I knew someone who was into young characters who ended up getting in trouble for chatting with a 16-year-old. So I'm not saying everyone has to not be upset by it/want to see it or that there is no bleed over with some people. But I'm saying it isn't a 1:1 correspondence, where someone into it is definitely going to abuse people in real life. And I agree with the OP that focusing on things like this meaning that those people are perverts while people who only like wholesome things are never perverts is a dangerous mindset to get into.