Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2020-02-15 03:04 pm
[ SECRET POST #4789 ]
⌈ Secret Post #4789 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 54 secrets from Secret Submission Post #686.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 08:56 pm (UTC)(link)And it's not like Doctor Who is historically apolitical. I mean, speaking personally, my favorite run of the show is the Cartmel era which was avowedly political. So the idea that being political is a problem for Who as a franchise I don't agree with. Chibnall is just a shitty writer.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 04:27 am (UTC)(link)Paradise Towers and the Happiness Patrol have no political undertones, absolutely none at all.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 01:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)I think it was most obvious with the mental health theme of last week's ep, which (for me) drew some natural comparisons with Vincent and the Doctor, which was handled so much more subtly and felt so much more affecting because of it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Maybe I'm too stupid to appreciate it better, and I fully accept that as someone who watches scifi for fun rather than thinking deeply/analyzing the episodes - but I'm not surprised that the ratings has dropped with the writing the way it is.
It really sucks because I'm already hearing people say that its bad because 'the doctor is a woman now' and then go on to describe how bad the story line was. They're literally describing how they feel about the writing and then go on to blame Jodie as if she had written the series so far herself, which really is unfair for her because she's a good doctor.
I mean, maybe its fine the way it is, but I think most people who have turned away were looking for escapism than having moral lessons talked at them. It is possible to have the exact amount of moral lessons and science fiction fantasy written into a story together to be good.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)I get why show runners wouldn't want to do it in fear of not being taken seriously, but some of the best episodes of Doctor Who have been 'silly' and were enjoyable to watch.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-15 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)Shitty writing is shitty writing
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 12:55 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 12:13 am (UTC)(link)I'd have loved to have seen a whole story about Noor Inayat Khan or that hospital in Aleppo. Instead, they feel like plot elements that were brutally trimmed down from their original story and rudely shoved into another one. Compared with the elegance of "Demons in the Punjab", it just... jars.
On the other hand, Captain Jack is back!
no subject
Holy fuck yeah. I read Noor Inayat Khan's biography last year and that episode barely scraped the surface of how awesome she is.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 01:21 am (UTC)(link)For the episode with Noor Inayat Khan, I think I read somewhere that they shot a few more scenes with her in them and one was her eventual execution. I can see why they left that out since the Doctor did take away all her memories of herself, including the knowledge that the Nazis don't win, and left her in her room with the floorboards removed to boot.
no subject
But like, the show has done environmentalist, or anticapitalist, or antiracist messages before. And it should. What bothers me is the need to pause at the end for the Doctor to explain what the message was how we should feel very bad and Do Something about climate change. It's not that it's woke, it's that its message is explained in a facile way via a monologue at the end, with no solution offered or suggested, where it should stand on its own.
I am seeing improvement though. The storylines are more complex this season, there's more weird shit, there's less pausing to explain what's happening to the viewer. I'm relieved that Jodie's getting at least one more season because she's really good and deserves better than some of the material she's gotten so far. Last season I was cringing a lot more, but this season I'm legitimately looking forward to every Sunday night.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 03:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I am digging this season though, because they've had parts where she has actually said the opposite of what's going on in her head and allowed the viewer to pick up the subtext. Like even a very young child would understand that if we see Gallifrey in flames, and then a few episodes later the Doctor says that everything's fine to her companions, it doesn't actually mean that everything is fine. I don't really remember anything like that happening last season and it really bothered me. But it's allowing the show and character to be interesting again as a narrative, and it's letting Jodie actually use her acting skills with decent material.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 01:16 am (UTC)(link)That was my comment!
(Anonymous) 2020-02-16 02:15 am (UTC)(link)