[ SECRET POST #4960 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #4960 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Ashes of Love]


__________________________________________________


03.
[BNA: Brand New Animal]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Lifetime Channel]


__________________________________________________



05.
[The Old Guard]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Giga Wrecker]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Star Wars]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Emma]






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #710.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Personally that's one reason why friendship ships are a thing I really like.

Same. Probably 99% of my ships are best friends who have a long history. I'm just not going to buy that people who just met a week ago are suddenly the love of each other's life that they'd do anything for, and so many romance plots rely on that, which is why they don't work for me at all. There needs to be some build up before I'm going to believe they're so in love.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm just not going to buy that people who just met a week ago are suddenly the love of each other's life that they'd do anything for

Then perhaps romance is not the genre for you.

If you can't buy that aliens might exist, don't watch science fiction. If you can't buy that people can fall in real true love in a week, don't watch romance.

[(Anonymous)]

DA This stuff happens across all genres, though? Like, yes, obviously, the romance genre focuses on romance, amazing. But if I want to watch an action or sci-fi or fantasy movie and they're ALSO falling in love in 48 hours there, where should I be going to avoid that?

[philstar22]

I'll give you that in a movie, there isn't a whole lot of time. But you can still show an expanse of time. Movies don't generally show real-time, meaning a minute of movie time doesn't mean a minute of time on screen. Movies often show days, months, or years happening for the characters. So there is time to develop a romance. And tvs and books have even less excuse. They can develop a romance, they are just choosing not to.

A romance genre doesn't mean the romance doesn't have to be or shouldn't be developed. Shouldn't that mean the opposite? If the romance is the theme and focus of the media, shouldn't developing it and making it believable be even more important?

[(Anonymous)]

Funny, most of the romance I end up reading these days involves extended character development as the main characters grow to overcome their cultural biases and become better suited to a relationship.

[(Anonymous)]

+1000

Like, instalove definitely exists in the romance genre; it's a much-criticized trope for a reason. But the flipside of that is that there are tons of romance authors who've listened to those criticisms--or who've made those criticisms themselves--and who are putting in the work to really develop the MCs' relationship over the course of the story.