Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-01-23 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #5132 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5132 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 35 secrets from Secret Submission Post #735.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 06:48 am (UTC)(link)Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 06:54 am (UTC)(link)Also a lot of older fandoms have maturer and more nuanced characters, and they just can't write that.
Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 08:24 am (UTC)(link)Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 09:07 am (UTC)(link)When Hannibal of all things went on Netflix, there was a nasty infestation of teen antis going postal over the very existence of any kind of NSFW art or fic at all. (Fucking HANNNIBAL.) It came to a horrific head when showrunner Bryan Fuller hit 'like' on some NSFW Hannigram art - consenting adult blowjob, thoroughly tame by the fandom standards - and teens lost their minds, that he was "exposing minors to porn." By clicking 'like.' It was such a shit show The Mary Sue wrote an article about it.
https://www.themarysue.com/bryan-fuller-done-with-anti-ship-bs/
Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 08:38 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Honestly
(Anonymous) 2021-01-24 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)Because the art in question was a consensual sex act between full-grown, non-related adults. The kind of thing billions of adults in the real world enjoy on a regular basis. Nothing illegal or immoral about it. And they still had a screaming poo-flinging meltdown over it.