case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-03-07 05:16 pm

[ SECRET POST #5175 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5175 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________



11.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 57 secrets from Secret Submission Post #741.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-03-07 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
To be honest, I just like "just evil" villains. I also like redeemable/tragic villain, but we have been getting lots of them recently, so you know, could use some evil just for evil.

(Anonymous) 2021-03-07 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
A villain can be "just evil" and also sympathetic though, without being redeemable or being redeemed /shrug

(Anonymous) 2021-03-07 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)
yes this. I think of Donquixote Doflamingo in One Piece: charismatic, complicated, and truly, truly evil to the core. His backstory shows what might have contributed to some of his motivations but in the end, when provided multiple routes to redemption over his life, he said "no thanks" and doubled down on the evil because he's just fucking evil. the sympathetic bits add so much nuance to him but he's still just. evil.