Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-03-23 05:58 pm
[ SECRET POST #5191 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5191 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #743.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:08 am (UTC)(link)His whole thing was that he was basically whatever the British version of sub-trailer trash is, but that at his core he was a person of integrity. Yeah, he was rough as shit around the edges, but in his own way he kept it classy, despite the fact that his life was trying to beat that out of him. And becoming an Kingsman empowered him in a way that allowed him to embody that inner integrity and classiness more fully.
So to have him ass-fuck a random princess after she literally tells him it’s a prize for saving the world (and he doesn’t even turn off his spy camera ffs!)—it basically ruins his entire arc for me. (And I liked most of the rest of the movie, so it felt like a slap in the face to have it half-way ruined by such a stupid thing at the very last moment.)
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:20 am (UTC)(link)I guess it's my own fault for watching something created by Mark Millar.
AYRT
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Lol! This describes the feeling perfectly!
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:25 am (UTC)(link)It ruined the movie for me too anon, for all the reasons you've stated. I loved virtually everything else about it, but that last scene completely trashed it for me and I haven't rewatched it since.
In retrospect, I think it was supposed to be his fully fledged James Bond style moment, but I feel like it showed a complete lack of awareness on the writers' parts of everything that had made Eggsy a great character up until that moment.
/His whole thing was that he was basically whatever the British version of sub-trailer trash is,/
The word you want is 'chav'. Eggsy's a chav. General all rounder phrase for people who don't talk posh or dress posh.
AYRT
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:48 am (UTC)(link)Yup, I 100% agree. I get that it was supposed to be a send-up of a common genre trope, but it just didn't fit—with the character's arc or the rest of the movie's vibe.
The word you want is 'chav'.
Thank you! I've heard the term before (mainly from watching Misfits :P), but I wouldn't have really known whether I was using it correctly in this context.
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:35 am (UTC)(link)BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:48 am (UTC)(link)NO SERIOUSLY
He marries her in the sequel so idk how random she is. Doesn't negate your point about his character though.
Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:54 am (UTC)(link)She is a perpetual damsel in distress though. She is literally a sexy lamp in movie two. I like the fact they stayed together, that seemed sweet, but at the same time, she's not a major important character as she had no personality.
Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 01:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 01:28 am (UTC)(link)Not trying to come for you, here. We can totally disagree on this and it's fine.
Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 03:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 05:14 am (UTC)(link)Re: BIG FUCKING (pun not intended) SPOILER
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 01:18 am (UTC)(link)I don't think anyone was trying to claim she's a significant character, just that she wasn't a random pump-and-dump, which changes the implications for his characterization somewhat.
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:52 am (UTC)(link)Like, I know they were trying to make this exaggerated satire of James Bond. And their literal thought at the end was "how do we top James Bond" type of thing. "What is the one thing we can do. Oh, ass fucking!" To them it was like this "joke." They really did think it was funny from the commentary.
It really soured it for me. Then the whole second movie had sequel problems (I include Channing Tatum as sequel problems at least he was only in it for less than 10 minutes) and the only reason I'd be willing to watch the Prequel is b/c it doesn't have the same characters. Maybe the female character agent will do more this time? If not, yeah, I'm over it.
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 01:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 01:40 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 02:08 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 02:47 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 05:46 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) - 2021-03-24 20:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 06:13 pm (UTC)(link)No. To me at least. It wouldn't have mattered whatever the sexual act. It's still annoying and cheapening to the entire story. His character development (haha see you can take the person out of X, but you can't take the X out of person/a reward for your hard work *eyeroll*). And her use as a character. Like who even is this? We see her for all of five minutes and all she's there for is to provide some motive and sex? Come on.
Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 08:31 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Not controversial enough to be a Fandom Secret, imo, so I'm dropping it here instead.
(Anonymous) 2021-03-24 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)I will say, if the fact that it was anal makes any difference to me at all, it is purely because the narrative treats it like it make a difference. The narrative clearly thinks anal is The Most a woman can offer a man. The narrative goes for anal specifically, and not vaginal, because that's the joke. "Haha! He's such a big hero she's willing to offer him The Ass!"
But if we set aside the female-objectifying, horndog narrative perspective that thinks sex is a thing women give up to men and that The Ass is the ultimate thing for a woman to "give up," and instead just look at the events of the scene objectively, then no, the fact that it's anal doesn't make a difference. What bothers me about the scene wouldn't change if it was vaginal instead.