[ SECRET POST #5211 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5211 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________


03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #746.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Disney question

[(Anonymous)]

To me the question of messaging is kind of irrelevant. I'm just not in favor of controlling the content children have access to in that way. IMO the damage you'll do by trying to control them in that way is greater than whatever damage the thing you're "protecting" them from might do. The best you can do for them is model the attitudes you want to instill in them; let them hear you expressing and living the values you'd like them to have.

Re: Disney question

[(Anonymous)]

I mean yes, in general. There are exceptions though. Letting them use computer games like Roblox where adults with malign intent can access and talk to them seems pretty effing stupid.

Re: Disney question

[(Anonymous)]

Of course there are exceptions.

Re: Disney question

[(Anonymous)]

' The best you can do for them is model the attitudes you want to instill in them; let them hear you expressing and living the values you'd like them to have.'

This is reasoning I hear a lot from parents who let their younger than 10 year olds play 18+ computer games. It's a bit of a hot button for me.