Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-05-19 05:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #5248 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5248 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 18 secrets from Secret Submission Post #751.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-20 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-05-20 02:15 am (UTC)(link)OP doesn't even suggest that. I don't think there's any way to read the secret to say that.
My honest opinion is that the secret had one purpose - starting wank about pets
NAYRT
(Anonymous) 2021-05-20 09:19 am (UTC)(link)So no, you didn't read the secret right if you think they want to hurt celebrities regardless of knowing whether they declawed a cat or not. And your incorrect way of reading the secret wasn't "the only way to read it". Why would someone clearly passionate about this subject like OP is make this secret just to start wank about animals anyways? It's way more logical that they wanted to simply state their views and spread awareness.
da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-20 02:24 pm (UTC)(link)It's great that OP wants to spread awareness, but they really could have done it in a much less dramatic way that doesn't paint people they don't even know in the worst light, without any evidence of their supposed crimes, and extremely flimsy reasoning for why they believe the people are guilty of that crime.
Re: da
(Anonymous) 2021-05-21 08:22 am (UTC)(link)