Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-10-19 07:45 pm
[ SECRET POST #5401 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5401 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

[Hannah Bayles (YouTube)]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Squid Game]
__________________________________________________
05.

[911]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Holliday Grainger (The Borgias, CB Strike)]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Ryan Bergara, Buzfeed Unsolved]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #773.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 12:09 am (UTC)(link)If you're going to genderswap a character, I want to read about how things would be different if that character were the opposite sex. I want to read about how the story would change, how their relationships would change, how their mindset would be different. If nothing changes at all, then what's the point?
For instance, in one of my fandoms, a large part of the plot has to do with a specific character being next in line for the throne. Genderswap that character into a woman and they wouldn't be next in line for the throne, which means an entire segment of the plot wouldn't happen the same way that it does in canon. That's interesting! I want to read stuff like that! But if it's just "[X] is female but nothing about the plot changes whatsoever," then who cares?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 12:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 12:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 05:15 am (UTC)(link)But I 100% support anyone's choice to write these stories as I can see the cathartic beauty of it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 07:28 am (UTC)(link)People seem to not get that unless the character is an angry stomping feminist in canon, the female version shouldn't be, either. Who says a dutiful knight would suddenly not be a dutiful knight that stays above all that because she's female now? Why would a character that started off as an arrogant jokester have to change? Because... women can't do that or something?
If anything, their demeanor is the one thing that *shouldn't* change because that's what keeps them recognizable. They should act the same. And have the same quirks. And at least, most of the same likes, dislikes, interests, etc. The interesting part is exploring their path to *getting* to what they are in canon, and that path is what should be demonstrated to have changed.
To use OP's example, female Tony Stark should still act p much exactly like male Tony Stark, and exploring how much of that is still the same issues and how she got there - because she must have got there, as she's Tony Stark, in spite of most of the canon counterpart's issues being very male-gendered - is the *fun* part smh
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 03:26 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-10-20 04:10 am (UTC)(link)