[ SECRET POST #5401 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5401 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.
[Hannah Bayles (YouTube)]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Squid Game]


__________________________________________________



05.
[911]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Holliday Grainger (The Borgias, CB Strike)]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Ryan Bergara, Buzfeed Unsolved]







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 19 secrets from Secret Submission Post #773.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

An anon from above, but yeah, I like when genderswap is treated the way it should be. As a total AU where a lot of events of the characters' lives change, not due to their gender but because of how the outside world reacts to them now that they are this gender. It *should* be a full AU!

[(Anonymous)]

Exactly. That's the kind of thing I'd be interested in reading, but it's so rarely what genderswap actually ends up being in practice.

[(Anonymous)]

I dunno, so many gender swapped M->F fics take a fun male character and turn her into this angry, stomping, put-upon feminist; and I am, frankly, an angry, stomping, put-upon feminist myself, so that's not my issue so much as they don't resemble the cooler than fuck character they once were. They're just kind of an angry turd flipping off at chauvinists and everyone hoorays them. It's satisfying in an activist sense but not in any fan fictional sense. If you get my meaning.

But I 100% support anyone's choice to write these stories as I can see the cathartic beauty of it.

[(Anonymous)]

Very different does not necessarily have to mean "super worse" - that's again, lazy writers not exploring options other than the straightforward.

People seem to not get that unless the character is an angry stomping feminist in canon, the female version shouldn't be, either. Who says a dutiful knight would suddenly not be a dutiful knight that stays above all that because she's female now? Why would a character that started off as an arrogant jokester have to change? Because... women can't do that or something?

If anything, their demeanor is the one thing that *shouldn't* change because that's what keeps them recognizable. They should act the same. And have the same quirks. And at least, most of the same likes, dislikes, interests, etc. The interesting part is exploring their path to *getting* to what they are in canon, and that path is what should be demonstrated to have changed.

To use OP's example, female Tony Stark should still act p much exactly like male Tony Stark, and exploring how much of that is still the same issues and how she got there - because she must have got there, as she's Tony Stark, in spite of most of the canon counterpart's issues being very male-gendered - is the *fun* part smh