case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-04 04:19 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #5447 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5447 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 43 secrets from Secret Submission Post #779.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Not seeing the lie.
killnotic: (Default)

[personal profile] killnotic 2021-12-04 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Facts.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Just facts here.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Affleck looks so young in the Armageddon poster, and that makes me feel so damn old. Could someone stop the flow of time, just for a little bit.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, seems like the one that doesn't have Michael Bay and Bruce Willis would be better. this checks out

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
This was the movie where I started recognising the trend of Bruce Willis being utterly checked out while movie making. When was the last time that Willis actually seemed to be having fun on screen? Everything he has done lately, he's been so emotionally dull in. You can almost hear him reciting "paycheck, paycheck, paycheck" in his head while he recites his lines.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 03:23 am (UTC)(link)
he seemed to be having fun in the video gorillaz did for stylo.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-04 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)
I don’t understand this way of thinking. To me, the movie I enjoy more is the better movie.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 03:43 pm (UTC)(link)
I can recognize that my second favourite book in my favourite series is probably the second worst book of the series from an objective point of view, but it's still my second favourite. You can recognize that something isn't great objectively but still love it.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 04:42 pm (UTC)(link)
What makes something “objectively good”? I’ve honestly never understood that. What can one possibly measure by, other than how much they liked it? (Or based on how many other people liked it, but I think that’s a good way to miss a lot of things one might like.)

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
There are skills involved in film-making, just as there are skills involved in singing, knitting, painting, building or any other craft. Some crafters execute those skills objectively better than others. Most people will agree that, objectively, Titanic is a better film than Sharknado. Subjectively? Different strokes for different folks.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 02:11 am (UTC)(link)
Both were pretty darn good, though. Didn't they come out around the same time?

(Anonymous) 2021-12-05 07:59 am (UTC)(link)
I've always liked Deep Impact more because it was more about the ordinary people while Armageddon was more about brave American heroes.
kathkin: (Default)

[personal profile] kathkin 2021-12-05 12:17 pm (UTC)(link)
did you just watch them this year or have you been holding onto this secret since 1998? i must know
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only