case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-18 03:59 pm

[ SECRET POST #5461 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5461 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #782.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 01:52 pm (UTC)(link)
What are your criteria for traditional fantasy if even northern European doesn't make the cut, you weirdo?

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 02:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Vaguely Arthurian.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 03:03 pm (UTC)(link)
DA

But if “vaguely Arthurian” is your only criteria for what makes a traditional fantasy, then that says it all. Your limited understanding and consumption of all the different varieties of traditional fantasy stories is a you problem, so you have no room to say anyone else has it wrong with their understanding of the subgenre.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 04:28 pm (UTC)(link)
NAYRT
So at least the "Marion Zimmer Bradley Rip Off" should fit that definition, right?

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
That's a bizarrely limited criterion considering that there's nothing particularly Arthurian about The Lord of the fucking Rings, which surely is a tentpole of traditional fantasy. JRRT wrote Arthurian works, and LOTR and the Hobbit are not that.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-19 09:27 pm (UTC)(link)
LMFAO and I'm guessing you don't mean Welsh.