[ SECRET POST #5467 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5467 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________































06. [SPOILERS for Plebs]



__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of sexualization of minors]


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #782.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I think it's useless and thought police-y to criticize intent when the intent doesn't show through in the source. If the same thing could have been written with innocent intent, because kids have bodily functions and genitals just like everyone else and that's not inherently sexual it's just reality, then it doesn't matter if the creator was thinking dirty thoughts while drawing it .

[(Anonymous)]

There are lots of things which people know happen but which are omitted from depictions for reasons such as everyone already being able to safely assume they happen (like taking a shit) but just because something happens and is a thing doesn't mean one's choice to include it is completely innocuous. And the manner in which its inclusion is depicted as well.

It's NOT thought policing to say that, hey, maybe the known loli/shotacon included such details because they're into that shit. I don't make any judgements but you have to be honest that sort of stuff isn't the kind of thing most people would include "just because" or the sake of "realism."

It would be more along the lines of policing to say something like "I don't think such content should ever be created in any context" or "I think anyone okay with this content or worse someone who likes it is bad wrong" but I'm not.

Methinks the lady doth protest too much. It's okay if you're into the stuff but I don't think this topic was ever about going after anyone and more along the lines of simply expressing discomfort with it. Which is totally okay and a valid response to anything in media.

[(Anonymous)]

+Infinity