Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-12-24 06:04 pm
[ SECRET POST #5467 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5467 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Plebs]

__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of sexualization of minors]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #782.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 03:58 am (UTC)(link)It's NOT thought policing to say that, hey, maybe the known loli/shotacon included such details because they're into that shit. I don't make any judgements but you have to be honest that sort of stuff isn't the kind of thing most people would include "just because" or the sake of "realism."
It would be more along the lines of policing to say something like "I don't think such content should ever be created in any context" or "I think anyone okay with this content or worse someone who likes it is bad wrong" but I'm not.
Methinks the lady doth protest too much. It's okay if you're into the stuff but I don't think this topic was ever about going after anyone and more along the lines of simply expressing discomfort with it. Which is totally okay and a valid response to anything in media.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 09:37 am (UTC)(link)