[ SECRET POST #5470 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5470 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #783.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

My theory is: I like romance. It's good and I enjoying reading it. But - and I think this is probably basically the case for most people - the kinds of romance that I like, that appeal to me, are hyper-specific. There are a lot of things that fundamentally don't work for me. And not just in the sense of big, splashy, romance-genre categories or tropes, but hyper-specific in terms of feeling and vibe and character and dialogue.

So finding a romance in the romance genre that works for me is extremely difficult, because all books appear alike and it's almost impossible to tell whether a book will work for me or not without reading it. But if a writer is telling a story - whether it's smut or comedy or action - that I already like and whose aesthetic I appreciate, the chances are a lot higher that I will also enjoy their interpretation of romance.

[(Anonymous)]

Yep, this. I'll read anything by T. Kingfisher/Ursula Vernon, including her romances, but there are other authors who write fantasy with romance plots that you'd have to pay me to read.