Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2021-12-27 05:59 pm
[ SECRET POST #5470 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5470 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 33 secrets from Secret Submission Post #783.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2021-12-28 11:05 am (UTC)(link)However, even if all of what I just said is true or not, death of the author is indeed still in affect here as it always is. And this person doesn’t have to treat the creators thoughts on the work as the only correct way to think, or consider anything in an interview as gospel. It still seems presumptuous of them if they think they know everything the creators intend without looking up interviews, but that’s only if they’re claiming the creator actually said something they didn’t. Besides that very specific scenario, this person never has to look up a single interview to have thoughts on how they feel about the work and how they think it should go. Because the creator has no bearing on that.
So that was a long and rambly way of saying I understand OP’s point of view while also agreeing with you and the anon above me.
OP
(Anonymous) 2021-12-29 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)