[ SECRET POST #5471 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5471 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 26 secrets from Secret Submission Post #783.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

I thought that the "representation" she wanted was queerness, which would apply to the m/m pairing. The fact that they're white and sexy doesn't invalidate the representation. It's a false dichotomy often used to discredit women liking slash, I know, but in fact, writing what you find sexy and being able to see yourself in it in some way is a fine and GOOD way to do representation. So yes, it's entirely likely she wanted to do m/m for queer rep and also for sexy guys. The two can coexist. ("But why not write f/f with sexy girls, then?" You'll say. I don't know, ask the multitude of lesbians who prefer to write m/m and have already answered this question a million times.)

[(Anonymous)]

Yessss... I do agree with everything you're saying but it does seem a teeny bit rich to grind the representation axe, when your main diversity points are being scored in a way calculated to get your rocks off.

[(Anonymous)]

+1

[(Anonymous)]

All of this, but also I believe Pacat is actually non-binary and male-aligned (though I don't believe they have a preference for pronouns) so it's entirely possible that they feel m/m queerness is what represents them best.

[(Anonymous)]

Of course she is.