[ SECRET POST #5484 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5484 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 28 secrets from Secret Submission Post #785.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

same anon you replied to

[(Anonymous)]

Oh believe me, I've talked to old school TERFs. I know they're very real. One of them actually told me about this festival at length & how trans women are predatory men, etc. Instead of being embarrassed when I outed myself as trans, she told me I'm a deluded traitor to my gender (I'm ftm). Not those exact words but pretty close.

But, let's not forget: JKR is also straight and probably didn't give a shit or even know about any of this either. This is the same woman who thought she was a great ally for making Dumbledore gay, despite not actually writing him being gay in 7 books or 2 spin-off movies - both heavily featuring his purported male love interest. And depriving me of Jude Law kissing men onscreen is one crime of Grindelwald that I simply cannot abide.

Anyway. JKR is a transphobic asshole but Rita Skeeter isn't trans.

Re: same anon you replied to

[(Anonymous)]

Didn't Rita appear in like the third or fourth book?

She was probably inspired by actual reporters and gossip that Rowling became aware of as a famous person.

Re: same anon you replied to

[(Anonymous)]

Nobody says she is trans, what they are saying is that the terms Rowling use to signal that skeeter is a villain is the same terms she uses to insinuate trans people are also.

Re: same anon you replied to

[tree_and_leaf]

I have a vague memory of the Guardian Women's Page in the nineties, which these days is TERF central, talking about trans-exclusionary feminism as a marginal, mostly US thing.* I don't know when Rowling started obsessing about trans folk, but I doubt it was at the front of her mind back then.

(The animagus argument is batshit. Plenty of other animagi in canon, more of them portrayed positively than not).

* Admittedly they also published Germaine Greer, but I don't recall it either being the party line, or as big a deal, as it is now.