Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-01-11 05:03 pm
[ SECRET POST #5485 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5485 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 21 secrets from Secret Submission Post #785.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: What changes between source material and adaptation were you happy about?
(Anonymous) 2022-01-12 03:49 am (UTC)(link)Re: What changes between source material and adaptation were you happy about?
(Anonymous) 2022-01-12 07:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: What changes between source material and adaptation were you happy about?
(Anonymous) 2022-01-12 07:41 am (UTC)(link)I haven't read the books, but I'm curious - what was the big point that the movies missed?
Re: What changes between source material and adaptation were you happy about?
(Anonymous) 2022-01-12 11:42 am (UTC)(link)Re: What changes between source material and adaptation were you happy about?
(Anonymous) 2022-01-12 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)But assuming you're not a troll, notice OP said book. Not books. You're the one who jumped to conclusions and assumed they were lumping them all together. Also, they never actually said the book was bad -- just that the movies based on the book were going to be better (because if you remember, there were two based on Mockingjay itself). It's not a stretch to see that the movies allowed multiple perspectives that provided overall better storytelling.