[ SECRET POST #5540 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5540 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #793.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

isn't boxing because the aiba turned out to be a bunch of corrupt bastards who were taking bribes for everything though, rather than the judging system being inherently flawed

[(Anonymous)]

I think being vulnerable to corruption is an inherent flaw of the judging system

[(Anonymous)]

NA

Uh, isn't being vulnerable to corruption an inherent flaw in all human-involved activities?

[(Anonymous)]

Yes! Absolutely. And there's been referee/officiating corruption scandals in other sports (for instance the NBA had a referee in the 2000s who was fixing games for gamblers). But the more impact that human judgment has on the income, the more vulnerable it is to corruption - boxing judges can directly decide who wins or who loses a match. So you need very robust systems to prevent corruption and that does not seem to ever work at the Olympics, ever.