case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-04-04 06:53 am

(no subject)

"I wanted to suggest that there could be a separate comment thread for each secret, but someone already suggested it and there was a concern about loading times.

I would rather bear the longer loading times for separate comment threads for each secret than painstakingly search for responses to specific secrets on each page of comments (and then going back to look if anyone's responded since last check).

There are other benefits as well:
- Questions about a specific secret (Eg. What episode is this secret from?) can be answered once for everyone without being repeatedly asked and answered over the course of 10+ pages.
- It could encourage people to comment on a secret that doesn't have any comments yet.
- It would save the Ctrl and F buttons of keyboards everywhere.

Could there at least be a poll about this suggestion please?"

[Poll #1377886]

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:15 am (UTC)(link)
That would make it lag harder? Wouldn't it be better than having to slog through every single page? Or do you mean it would force everything onto the first page?

And "name the fandom" is for offering information. "what's that from" would be seeking it. Even people who know may not offer unless they see that someone's specifically looking.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:19 am (UTC)(link)
That's odd considering I usually see very few replies in that thread, while the rest of the comments are peppered with "what's that from?"

And yeah, I have. It runs faster to do it that way. Unless my computer is in the Trick Room or something. Which actually, the way it's been messing up, I wouldn't doubt for a second.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
Why *do* they do that? Expand ought to expand EVERYTHING from that point on. Is that a programming glitch?

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
But for those who do, why doesn't it expand all?

man sorry. majorly off topic. it's 4:30 am and I'm still stuck at work.

[identity profile] aliaras.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I have "expand" on some comms (I think F!S is one of them) but not others...it's weird.

I need to get one of those firefox addons.

[identity profile] silveryrose.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:23 pm (UTC)(link)
It's to preven the database servers from getting overloaded with requests.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 10:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Odd though. I can't imagine it would account for that many more.

[identity profile] silveryrose.livejournal.com 2009-04-05 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
For an individual thread in an individual journal/community it's not going to add much, but when you have a bunch of users hitting the databases as often as they hit livejournal's it starts to add up fast.