case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2009-04-04 06:53 am

(no subject)

"I wanted to suggest that there could be a separate comment thread for each secret, but someone already suggested it and there was a concern about loading times.

I would rather bear the longer loading times for separate comment threads for each secret than painstakingly search for responses to specific secrets on each page of comments (and then going back to look if anyone's responded since last check).

There are other benefits as well:
- Questions about a specific secret (Eg. What episode is this secret from?) can be answered once for everyone without being repeatedly asked and answered over the course of 10+ pages.
- It could encourage people to comment on a secret that doesn't have any comments yet.
- It would save the Ctrl and F buttons of keyboards everywhere.

Could there at least be a poll about this suggestion please?"

[Poll #1377886]

[identity profile] master-kogane.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:07 am (UTC)(link)
At least you still give as an opt out, pfffff.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:10 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe something like 1-25, 26-50, etc, and a thread for "what's that from?"

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:15 am (UTC)(link)
That would make it lag harder? Wouldn't it be better than having to slog through every single page? Or do you mean it would force everything onto the first page?

And "name the fandom" is for offering information. "what's that from" would be seeking it. Even people who know may not offer unless they see that someone's specifically looking.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:19 am (UTC)(link)
That's odd considering I usually see very few replies in that thread, while the rest of the comments are peppered with "what's that from?"

And yeah, I have. It runs faster to do it that way. Unless my computer is in the Trick Room or something. Which actually, the way it's been messing up, I wouldn't doubt for a second.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:24 am (UTC)(link)
Why *do* they do that? Expand ought to expand EVERYTHING from that point on. Is that a programming glitch?

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
But for those who do, why doesn't it expand all?

man sorry. majorly off topic. it's 4:30 am and I'm still stuck at work.

[identity profile] glamourcorpse.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:27 am (UTC)(link)
I love you. I was thinking of suggesting this ages ago, but figured I'd keep my yap shut. By all means, do this!!!

[identity profile] misskass.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
Pretty much this. ♥

[identity profile] madelineusher.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:29 am (UTC)(link)
The problem with that system would be that it would eliminate one of the main purposes of the one-thread-per-secret idea - namely, reducing the amount of ctrl+f that one has to do. If 25 secrets are clustered in one thread it will be far harder to find the replies that you're actually looking for.

[identity profile] blackjackrocket.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:31 am (UTC)(link)
I was thinking that it would narrow it down, and with the numbers in the titles (hopefully) it would narrow the scope, but I forgot that this comm gets over a thousand comments per post sometimes. As I said, 4:30 am and still at work.

[identity profile] madelineusher.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:33 am (UTC)(link)
Hahaha, yeah, unfortunately to have any hope of sorting this many comments you have to sort very finely. And erk, hope you get off soon!

[identity profile] yuliee.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:55 am (UTC)(link)
I say give it a test run?

[identity profile] emma1794.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 11:58 am (UTC)(link)
This.

[identity profile] sjorn.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:01 pm (UTC)(link)
You mean make a seperate post for every single secret? idgi.

[identity profile] sjorn.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh wait, comment thread.

Sure, that sounds good.

[identity profile] sjorn.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, sorryyy. |D I'mma little slow today.

[identity profile] galerian-ash.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:06 pm (UTC)(link)
Noooooooooooooo! That idea makes no sense D:<

I mean, it seems to me that most of us comment on several secrets -- not just one. That would mean we'd have to post a bunch of replies to the appropriate threads! How time-consuming (and plain dumb) isn't that?

[identity profile] uozlulu.livejournal.com 2009-04-04 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Let's try it out for a couple days or a week and repoll.

Page 1 of 4