[ SECRET POST #5610 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5610 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 27 secrets from Secret Submission Post #803.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

NAYRT You can drop the defensiveness now. OT3s aren't for everyone and that's okay.

[(Anonymous)]

Where are you getting defensiveness from? Feo didn’t even talk about OT3s. That was the point of the secret and original comment, of course. But feo only said that it sounded like bad writing in the original work if only two out of three main characters who are all supposed to be close actually feel like they have a bond, and the third feels more like an add-on. I honestly think this is a fair point. Because it’s not even just a shipping thing in that case. It can also mean that the author also didn’t write the friendship very well when it comes to this one character who’s supposed to be both friends with the other two, and just as important to the plot as them.

[(Anonymous)]

da and yeah, i've definitely seen canons where three characters are all supposed to be close but it doesn't come across that way in the actual writing and two characters get way more development with each other than with the third. even if it's just supposed to be a friendship, that's bad writing.