[ SECRET POST #5628 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5628 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[FFXIV]


__________________________________________________



07.
[RuPaul's Drag Race]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Sister Boniface Mysteries]


__________________________________________________




























09. [WARNING for discussion of sexual assault/violence]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]




__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for discussion of abuse]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #805.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Or, it's because she continued to slander JD in the public sphere, so of course he'd want the rebuttal to be just as public. I mean, she leaked pictures of her alleged abuse to the tabloids. Nobody who wants to keep things private does that.

[(Anonymous)]

She made a single mention in public interviews that didn't even mention fucking names, and Depp is a fucking pedo who supports Planski so he deserves to be in the trash, he's not gonna dress up as Sparrow and date you.

[(Anonymous)]

It was obvious who she was talking about, and JD being a jackass doesn't make AH's abuse okay. Also, thanks for the misogyny, Mx. defender of women's rights.

[(Anonymous)]

What part of assuming you wanna ride Depp's dick is misogyny, a lot of gay men wanted to fuck him too. This is well known.

[(Anonymous)]

And yet, whenever I hear this, it's addressed to women. Curious. Just face it: if someone keeps lying on the stand, they stop being credible. I already wrote a comment explaining why I don't side with AH. And hint, hint, it has nothing to do with JD's dick

[(Anonymous)]

literally the "white knight" trope and "she's not gonna fuck you bro" is super common, what are you even on about.

[(Anonymous)]

Usually when men are defending work from abuse at that, usually from the folks using "male feminist" as an insult. Either way, you ignored all my points in favor of an ad hominem, so gooood on you, I guess?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gzGVnDd2-t8

BTW, how about you take a listen to AH definitely being a victim and not being a horrifying, gaslighting, manipulating abuser at all. Tw: for self harm, btw

[(Anonymous)]

Nah, you'll side with the pedo who had a 16-year-old girlfriend when he was 23.

[(Anonymous)]

And you'll side with the domestic abuser, I guess.

[(Anonymous)]

Also tabloids "mysteriously" getting access to photos and videos of her abuse is not a single interview.

[(Anonymous)]

Nobody said she wanted to keep things private. This is not about her privacy or the alleged slander. This is about him making this trial public, which he shouldn’t have done. People would have found out the results anyways, because transcripts are almost always public record. But it actually being televised and open to the public the entire time was the problem, which again, most people aren’t objecting to because they care about her privacy.