Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2022-06-24 05:52 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2022-06-24 05:52 pm
[ SECRET POST #5649 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5649 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
[Ted Lasso]
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World Dominion]
__________________________________________________
06. [SPOILERS for Jurassic World Dominion]
__________________________________________________
07. [WARNING for discussion of marital infidelity]
__________________________________________________
08. [WARNING for discussion of incest]
__________________________________________________
09. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse, sexualization of children]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #808.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
https://i.imgur.com/dKtBFr7.jpg
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-06-25 02:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-06-25 02:58 am (UTC)(link)But I agree with OP that "for science" is a more fun motivator for a villain that "for money" or "for evil", especially in the context of the Jurassic Park movies where "science going too far" has always been a MAJOR theme--along with the money, obviously, but in the OG it was pretty clear that the park was going to have problems even without the money-motivated villains. It would be nice to see the what-if of that conclusion.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-06-25 03:08 am (UTC)(link)