case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2022-09-30 06:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #5747 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5747 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.
[Halt and Catch Fire]



__________________________________________________



02.
[Buffy the Vampire Slayer]


__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.



__________________________________________________



09.



__________________________________________________



10.
[According to Jim]


__________________________________________________



















11. [SPOILERS for Stranger Things Season 4]




__________________________________________________



12. [SPOILERS for The Wishing Stone]




__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia]








































Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #822.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
what bothered me is OP calling artists "hobbyists" who complain about ai making it harder for them to make money. it seems like op is just devaluing artists from the get-go. as for being outdone by an AI...you mean big publishers pay me 4k for a cover that can surely be done better by an AI? I don't think so. I'm just bothered by people calling themselves artists because they put some words into a computer (ironically, that's how a lot of people think digital art is made so putting ai art into the same category makes me very angry). if anyone can take any credit for a piece generated by an ai it's the people who built it and not some rando who thinks they made art in 15 seconds.

(Anonymous) 2022-10-01 09:46 am (UTC)(link)
Any human can create art. Even if it's only a two second scribble. It doesn't make them an Artist in the grandest sense of the word, but it's still art. An AI cannot create art. It's a machine. Anything produced by it is free of inspiration or passion or talent or skill. The person who built it might and the person operating it may have talent and skill but only the equivalent talent and skill of say creating Google and then being really good at using it as a search engine. That is not art.