Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2022-12-19 06:09 pm
[ SECRET POST #5827 ]
⌈ Secret Post #5827 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #834.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 01:41 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 02:26 am (UTC)(link)Anyway, cloaca.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 03:36 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 06:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 07:46 am (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 04:15 am (UTC)(link)I prefer this sort of cloaca-lite explanation over just straight up giving the dude a cloaca, for one because as someone who tends to be a smidge squicked by furry/animal stuff, the idea of, like, "He plowed into his mate's hot, tight cloaca," is a tiny bit too animal for my preference (though I wouldn't call it a hard pass by any means), and also I just don't love the idea of the pee hole and the poop hole being the same (which I realize is borderline hypocritical since I'm the one arguing that it doesn't matter if the poop hole and the baby hole are the same, but it's just how I personally feel, not necessarily a stance based in iron clad rationality).
Plus, with a cloaca, I have all these questions suddenly, like, is the partner's dick fucking through the cloaca into the anus? Or is the main body of the cloaca basically functioning, deeper in, as a vagina and getting the majority of the fucking? Is it difficult for the penetrating partner not to hit the opening to the anus or the urethra by accident? Like how good does his(/her) aim have to be? And like, I don't hate these questions. You could actually do some hot, weird, kinky shit with this idea and I'd probably be here for it. But for me personally, "passage deep in the anus that leads to the uterus," is just simpler, and I am already very primed to view the anus as a sexytimes zone, whereas for me if the word "cloaca" showed up in a fic it would take some coaxing to get me past the, "Wait, like birds and reptiles have??" response and back into the sexytimes headspace.
But that's just me and I'm not actually arguing with you at all. I wholly support your comment, and I also support the validity of using "cloaca" as an explanation for how this shit works in mpreg-supporting universes.
I also don't know much about cloacas beyond what a few diagrams have taught me, so there's that. lol.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 06:31 am (UTC)(link)In marsupials (and a few other animals) other than monotremes, there's one external opening and then inside there's separate passages to the vagina, anus and urethra. So you would fuck the pouch area, not specifically into one passage - and some marsupials have two or four-headed penises.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 07:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: OP
It just made more sense to me than a fetus somehow in the colon? or intestinal tract? or whatever?
(There was no mpreg in my fic - the character opted for hysterectomy early on and it was never desired or considered.)
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-12-20 09:29 pm (UTC)(link)Above anon and yeah, see, that's my exact problem with mpreg, IDK why everyone in this thread is having so much difficulty understanding that. You can't just have a fetus growing in the stomach or the intestinal tract because there's no space in those organs for that, they're not meant for that purpose.
Re: OP
There's space in the male body for a uterus, ESPECIALLY if we're talking about humans that actually are supposed to come with that feature, but in already-existing organs? Hell no.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2022-12-21 12:37 am (UTC)(link)