[ SECRET POST #5838 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5838 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 36 secrets from Secret Submission Post #836.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

03. https://i.imgur.com/2q4C2RP.png

I agree.

[(Anonymous)]

I do think a case for fraud can be made from these kinds of things. Same with ads for products that say things aren't just exaggerations but are actually false. I would also be okay with any people being able to win against politicians for any explicit lies during campaign ads or speeches.

[meadowphoenix]

idk i found it so fucking hilarious that a lot of people thought lydia tar was a real person to be completely on board.

i also wish there was in general more art in marketing, which means that trailer, posters, and the like were crafted by the people involved in making the film. and i do think marketing incentives to misrepresent are out of control. but, yeah, gonna be honest, fine with the director trolling when that makes sense for the film and wouldn't want a court ruling to forestall that possibility.