[ SECRET POST #5876 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #5876 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #841.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[meadowphoenix]

the secret being aimed at f!s doesn't mean the sentiment regarding knowledge is. contextually it's about the what people producing shows are influenced by. that's not f!s. i invoked f!s only to demonstrate what a more well-rounded knowledge base understands, and there's plenty of confusion. this could only be exacerbated by the people producers are directing their show towards. op's right.

[(Anonymous)]

OP said 'who has ever heard of the Minoans'. OP has been proven literally wrong by many responses to their secret from people who have, in fact, heard of the Minoans, including your own, lol. I have agreed that their sentiment is probably right, but that doesn't change that the actual words they used are wrong.

[meadowphoenix]

straight up, if hyperbole is beyond you, that's fine. if you're taking hyperbole literally as a sign to correct the statement, that's hilarious.

[(Anonymous)]

Hyperbole's great. But if the hyperbole can be immediately contradicted, it loses it's effectiveness, invites criticism, and even looks a bit silly.

Heard of/ not heard of is an objective binary (even if you argue that it isn't). Used in hyperbole, it leaves the author open to others picking holes in their argument.

Better phrasing would have been 'who even cares' - that's subjective, so OP's side can be supported more easily. It's also pretty easy to argue that if you don't know enough about a subject you don't care about it.

[meadowphoenix]

hyperbole can always be immediately contradicted, relies on being obviously open for critical attack and is deliberately silly lmao. right, so it's beyond you AND you want to correct it. this is great! i honest to god hope you do this in outside the internet. this is the type of conversation that is really fun to watch.

[(Anonymous)]

I mean, if you want to argue that as hyperbole is by definition exaggerated that any exaggeration is effective as rhetoric device, sure.

[meadowphoenix]

if you want to argue that as hyperbole is by definition exaggerated
ah, you're so close!