case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-02-17 05:08 pm

[ SECRET POST #5886 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5886 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.
[Stargate SG-1]



__________________________________________________






























09. [SPOILERS for Treasure Planet]




__________________________________________________



10. [WARNING for discussion of incest]

[Vampire Game]



__________________________________________________



11. [WARNING for possible discussion of transphobia (JK Rowling related)]




__________________________________________________



12. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia, other bigotry, suicide]
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #842.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Transcript by OP

(Anonymous) 2023-02-18 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Where the fuck are all these men perving in changing rooms and how is that any different from the long history of peeping toms? If someone is being a creep in a changing room, they're being a creep in the changing room and should be removed, regardless of appearance.

Did that double-rapist actually GET any of the wished-for options you listed here, or is it another overly-specific example you're using to vilify innocent people? I'm not disagreeing that that person is a giant piece of shit, but like any other criminal, what the absolute fuck does that have to do with people who aren't criminals?

The assumption that a transwoman a) will act just like a cis man in any given situation and b) is just lying in order to commit or otherwise cover up for a crime IS TRANSPHOBIC.

Re: Transcript by OP

(Anonymous) 2023-02-19 08:31 am (UTC)(link)
NAYRT, but with the part about a man posing as a trans women to go to women's prison, I think they were referencing Isla Bryson, one recent case that prompted Scotland to temporarily stop sending men convicted of raping women to women's prison, pending further investigation.

I get that you're defensive because some people are absolute dicks about the existence of trans women, but there has to be a way to address what trans people need without making it harder for women to avoid being raped by cis men.

And "what's at stake?" and "what would a cis guy stand to gain by lying about being trans?" is more clear cut with gender-segregated criminals than it is with, say ... guys who take surreptitious creepshots of women and post them online.