case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-05-12 05:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #5971 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5971 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[Monster Musume]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________









































04. [SPOILERS for The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for Andrew Tate and associated discussion]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse]




__________________________________________________



07. [WARNING for discussion of transphobia, antisemitism]

[Saturday Night Live]























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #853.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Bah Humbug internets

(Anonymous) 2023-05-12 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it was deleted but as I understand it broadly it was, we think AI is good, we don't want more regulations on it, we think the idea of training corpuses with fanfic is cool, and who knows maybe there will be people shipping the different AIs.

And the thing is there is legitimate legal ambiguity here (because even if you think AI is bad, tightening regulations on AI could potentially make the copyright status of fanfic and transformative work trickier) but the interview really didn't frame it that way.