[ SECRET POST #6002 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6002 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Identity V]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.
























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 31 secrets from Secret Submission Post #858.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Congrats on a successful derail. Leaping to correct people is clearly the tactic to use, I'm stealing that for the future.

[(Anonymous)]

Is it really derailing?

OP is raising the question of why directors cut something from the movie in its theatrical version, and then put it back in the extended version.

Well, oftentimes, the answer is that they don't - the studio is the one that cut it from the theatrical version, not the director.

[(Anonymous)]

That's literally just the truth, though. Directors often get told by the studio that they have to take things out. Sometimes it's for ratings reasons, sometimes it's for timing reasons, sometimes it's just because the studio doesn't think the scene is important to the work as a whole.

[(Anonymous)]

"Well, actually-ing" the OP is always good for starting drama, especially if you can get it in as a first comment. It always comes across as confrontational.

[(Anonymous)]

How is it "well actually-ing"!!

It's not a meaningless technicality. It's extremely relevant to the point OP was making!