[ SECRET POST #6036 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6036 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 37 secrets from Secret Submission Post #863.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Objectively seeing writing as "good" vs "bad" can carry with you only so far as to why certain/most fics don't appeal to you.

TBH I hate these sorts of overly simplified takes as if it's simple knowledge for all of us to be in consensus on what "good writing" in fan fiction/fiction/writing in general us.

"Good" as in the fic is generally/absolutely solid in its grammar and the setup, delivery and payoff are well done?
Or "good" as in you enjoyed the fic because the premise pitched to me paid off?

What if the story you're reading is a stream of consciousness and the lack of grammar is the point?
One can argue your expectations of "good writing" is shallow/missing more context by writing said fic off as bad simply because it didn't meet your standards of proper/good grammar.

There's a difference between "I wish the fics I read had better grammar/better delivery in storytelling/etc" and "I only read fics that have good writing".

Yeah, what is good writing to you and why do you expect your fandom(s) to adhere to your expectations?