case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-07-21 05:04 pm

[ SECRET POST #6041 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6041 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.
[The Adventures of Jonny Quest]



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



































08. [SPOILERS for Angels of Death]




__________________________________________________



09. [WARNING for discussion of underage/grooming]

[Becoming Elizabeth]




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #863.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
anoldsmudge: (Default)

[personal profile] anoldsmudge 2023-07-21 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes, I think this is it. Many writers I feel misunderstand the idea that "stories need conflict to be interesting/compelling," taking it to mean that not only must there be conflict in the overall narrative, but that there must also be conflict between all parties present in the narrative. It does not occur to them that it is possible to have two characters who get along perfectly well with each other, but who are in conflict with other characters, or with some sort of external force/threat.

I don't recall this being as much of an issue before the aughts.