[ SECRET POST #6056 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6056 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #866.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fscom]

06. https://i.imgur.com/BxIt2Zh.png

[tabaqui]

Wow, that's a pairing i have never seen, and an argument for the 'ship i've never heard.
Blech.
That guy was utterly uninteresting and gross, and nope, would not ship ever.

[(Anonymous)]

RIGHT? And yet people who I genuinely like, and who in so many other areas have fandom opinions which line up close enough to mine, are SO into it that I can't complain about it in the chat...

[(Anonymous)]

Aye yo, it's DJO!

[(Anonymous)]

heck yes

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah no I don't see it lol. Tommy was just your average HS bully. I don't think he was secretly tortured by his love for Steve.

And he didn't even have enough of a personality beyond Basic Bully for me to figure out where people would pull that from.

Like even though I don't ship it, I GET Billy/Steve and Jonathan/Steve, but Tommy/Steve??

[(Anonymous)]

Like... Tommy had this whole thing where HE could have a serious girlfriend but he got upset about STEVE having Nancy, but even *that*, like... if Steve had been with a girl who 'fit' with them, who was friends with Carol, would that have even been a thing? It's really hard for me to see it as necessarily romantic?? He's a troglodyte, but still a human with feelings, I get that there's real hurt when Steve outgrows him and tells him off, and a friendship ending is a blow for anyone, but like... he doesn't CHANGE because of it, he just becomes more of a dick and finds someone worse to play lackey to?? So even IF you think 'oh well he loved Steve', like... not enough. Not enough to change. So why should I care about him?

I think if Jonathan and Steve had actually been allowed to be friends and interact after fighting a monster together with Nancy, then Steve/Jonathan or Steve/Nancy/Jonathan would have been interesting, and the way the show played out, there wasn't enough. Billy/Steve is LOATHSOME to me and I genuinely cannot read Billy as *attracted* to men, BUT, I think there's a sexual component to his bullying of Steve/trying to take his 'crown'? Like, in the way that sexual harassment is about power rather than attraction, and the way that it's rooted in *competition*? But I don't think Neil Hargrove being homophobic ACTUALLY has anything to do with his son's sexuality-- I think he saw his son get an ear piercing and decided at that point that everything he did from that point on would be viewed through a certain lens, like he's of a generation where he'd immediately jump to 'this looks gay', whereas *Billy* is in the generation where *which ear you get pierced matters*, and his is the 'straight' ear.