case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-08-19 04:25 pm

[ SECRET POST #6070 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6070 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.
[Baldur's Gate 3]



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.
[Date a Live]



__________________________________________________



07.



__________________________________________________



08.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 56 secrets from Secret Submission Post #868.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-08-19 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I think part of the problem is that current fandom approach is to (not universally, but it definitely happens) reward people for finding flaws in the media they consume. It feels virtuous to uncover and loudly trumpet on social media a mistake or oversight, and if enough people go digging deep, of course they're going to find a flaw. Even if they have to really reach for it. And then more and more people feel virtuous if they signal boost that discovery, even if they haven't verified it for themselves or even seen the media in question. It's ridiculous.
sabotabby: (jetpack)

[personal profile] sabotabby 2023-08-19 10:26 pm (UTC)(link)
This. And there's no point in criticizing the vast swathes of reactionary media that's not even going to try, only the stuff that is basically well-intentioned and might get a reaction.