case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-09-25 06:09 pm

[ SECRET POST #6107 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6107 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.

























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 32 secrets from Secret Submission Post #873.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-26 05:51 am (UTC)(link)
Because "queerbaiting" is not real. It is literally just people mad their ship isn't canon trying to dress it up in progressive language to make their tantrums seem more legitmate.

(Anonymous) 2023-09-26 06:26 am (UTC)(link)
No, it's a real thing with a word that gets overused and misused. It's like "gaslighting" and "cultural appropriation."

Writers who have stated afterwards that they liked implying a queer ship might happen when they didn't mean to make it happen are guilty of queerbaiting. That is the definition. If we don't know their intent, we can't know for sure if something is queerbaiting. But it's not like writers stating their intent was to queerbait in all ways except using the word has never happened.