[ SECRET POST #6116 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6116 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.


























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 14 secrets from Secret Submission Post #874.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

When it comes to Richard III, people don't seem very interested in nuance, unfortunately. You see an example of it upthread where a nonny assumes that if you don't think Richard III is innocent, then you must be a victim of vicious Tudor propaganda and are also romanticizing Henry VII. In the mind of a lot of Ricardians, it's just that black vs. white. They cannot imagine others taking a more objective, nuanced look at BOTH Richard and Henry, because they cannot bring themselves to do so for Richard.