[ SECRET POST #6174 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #6174 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________




























02. [SPOILERS for Super Mario RPG remake]




__________________________________________________



03. [SPOILERS for One Piece]




__________________________________________________



04. [WARNING for discussion of RL politics, genocide]




__________________________________________________



05. [WARNING for discussion of pedophilia/incest]




__________________________________________________



06. [WARNING for discussion of child abuse]





























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 00 secrets from Secret Submission Post #882.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed, but sadly in this day and age nuance is dead. When "can we not kill innocent civilians?" is controversial even when you don't specify the nationality of said innocent civilians, we're all doomed.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

I don't think that's a "day and age" thing. People have been finding reasons why it's okay to kill out-group civilians since the dawn of time.

Remember: in the Bible, when God sent His followers to wage war on adherents of other gods, he commanded them to kill them all. He made no distinction between enemy combatants and civilians; between men and women; between adults and children. He wanted them all to be wiped out.

And so it continues to be.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Historically, when a people or country is conquered, the winners get to enjoy it.

Israel goes through several wars for a small patch of land in the middle east, and they still get decades of terror from pissed off sore loser Muslims that have literally 60x the land.

There's my controversial take. Not Jewish, btw. Just tired of these bullshit wars over religion.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Insanely bad take.

The conflict is not fundamentally about religion. Palestinian Muslims have a distinct national identity from other Arabic speaking Muslims. And the right of conquest is not some absolute natural law.

Just objectively bad history.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

To call the Muslims sore losers is to imply that Israel won some kind of contest or war. Is it winning if it's just handed to you from colonialists?

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

Jewish people no matter what color they are, are indigenous to Israel. There are no colonialists.

(frozen comment)

[(Anonymous)]

And that is why there was a massive wave of immigration in the forties, fifties, and sixties, because they were always there.