case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2023-12-04 07:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #6177 ]


⌈ Secret Post #6177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.




























Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 24 secrets from Secret Submission Post #883.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-05 05:41 am (UTC)(link)
Saying people can't make a judgment about whether a work should have a sequel/prequel or not because 'only the author can decide that' is basically like saying people can't call a work good or not because 'only the author knows that'. I.e. it's a pretty stupid take.

(Anonymous) 2023-12-05 06:57 am (UTC)(link)
This. It's not like the people making the stories are some infallible beings who only make the correct decisions with their own properties. And if the pressure to continue the story comes from the studio/publisher, as is sometimes the case, it's not really a creative decision at all. Getting paid is a powerful motivator, but it doesn’t necessarily result in a worthwhile sequel.